On Sep 26, 2009, at 3:40 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 03:22:18PM -0400, paul stenquist wrote:
Given the caption, the crop obviously presents a different message
than
what was originally recorded in the photo. That is fact.
No it isn't - it's still your interpretation. What Cheney is doing
remains the same, whether or not the photograph is cropped. Whether
there are other people in the photograph doesn't alter that.
Personally I think the whole editorial choice to pick a photograph
with Cheney at the carvery to illustrate a story about torture is
a pretty clear case of unacceptable editorialisation - the events
depicted in the photograph have nothing to do with the actual story.
You're correct. The combination of this pic and the caption about
torture is what makes it unethical.
But for me that message is in no way altered by the act of cropping;
at the most it just makes the point a little more obvious.
Right again. But to make the point obvious, the editors had to alter
the photo by cropping it. That's why the crop is an unethical
alteration. To avoid this kind of situation, many news organizations
prohibit crops that change the content.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
