Oliver Evilly suggests: hmm - 55, 75, 105..... why not pick up the 55-100 zoom :) use a 2x, and you also have 110 - 200 - but f8 :(
MUCH lighter, Paul.. It's my preffered daily equipment. I did some trekking around Utah\Nevada in the summer with this kit, and 1) it was comfortable (apart from being 114 in the shade), 2) it will fit in a smaller (and more appropriate) backpack, leaving room for water :). 3) It also gives us wimpy folks spare weight to carry a nice heavy tripod..... Oliver ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 8:03 AM Subject: Re: P67II or P645n > P�l Audun Jensen wrote: > The short answer is that the 645 system can replace a 35mm system whereas the > 67 can not. > This provided that you use a rather complete set of lenses and are not into > weightlifting. > >> I lift weights five days a week. Have been doing so for ten years. The 6x7 kit >> is no burden. My travel kit, which fits into a 1520 Pelican, is going to >> consist of a 6x7 body with the 300, 150, 105, and 55. I intend to do some >> hiking in the LA canyons with most or all of the equipment. Hopefully, in >> about a week. I still need to find (and finance) the 55. I will probably add a >> 75 at some time, but that's long term, and it may force me to move up one case >> size. >> Paul > - - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
