It all boils down, largely, to whether you're pixel-peeping, or printing something above an 8x10 (inches).
I agree totally. Many of my favorite images were taken with an *ist D. And I'll still argue that I find the *ist D to be a a more likeable camera, than anything Pentax produced prior to the K7. I've gotten great shots out of a Fuji disposable as well. The question boils down to, what is likely to yield the better image? All things equal, better resolution is the winner (also a lens factor). I find nothing at all compelling about the 4/3 format. It's significantly smaller than APS-C and is not significantly less expensive (if at all). And it would require a new lens complement. I've bought two lenses for the Sony Nex5, but it's still an APS-C sensor. Who can tell us why 4/3 format is emperically more desirable than an APS-C sensor? Without bringing the other attributes of a specific camera body or lens into the discussion Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
