Hi Dave: I think the DA 16-45 lens is a great lens for the money. For over
a year now, I've been shooting a construction project and I use the 16-45 &
the DA* 50-135mm on two camera bodies(originally started with K20/K10D, but
now shoot with K7 and K20D). The shots below were taken with the 16-45 at
high ISOs, slow shutter speeds & the K20D was mounted on a tripod. I most
definitely recommend this lens.
http://www.caguila.com/caguila/trconstructionjuly132010/index.html
Here are some recent shots with the K7 and the DA 16-45mm.
http://www.caguila.com/caguila/trcnov18/index.html
I did a theater shoot & used the 16-45. I thought the lens performed well
with the K20D.
http://www.caguila.com/caguila/hayfever/index.html
As to the DA* 50-135mm f2.8, well, it's a gem. Absolutely love it.
Cheers, Christine
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Mann" <[email protected]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 2:10 AM
Subject: DA 16-45 f/4 lens
I just noticed the camera shop's ad also has this lens on special (not the
16-50 f/2.8 unfortunately). What's the group's consensus on this one? It
might be a bad assumption that PDML can agree on anything, but it's worth a
try.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
