Sounds like a match in the making "Leon Altoff" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi Dave, > >I have this lens and I like it. It's not ever going to be as sharp >and fast as the 16-50 f2.8 (and it won't be a s heavy either), but for >the money it's a very good lens. > >My only problem with it was that I always seemed to want a little bit >more length out of it and was constantly swapping to a longer lens and >back again. I've since added a DA 17-70 to my lens collection which I >find covers that bit extra I need. The 16-45 is sitting around with >the other lenses that I no longer use waiting for me to sell them to >people who can help them fulfil their purpose in life (to be attached >to a camera and take pictures). > >Leon > >On 4 December 2010 19:10, David Mann <[email protected]> wrote: >> I just noticed the camera shop's ad also has this lens on special >(not the 16-50 f/2.8 unfortunately). What's the group's consensus on >this one? It might be a bad assumption that PDML can agree on >anything, but it's worth a try. >> >> Cheers, >> Dave > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
