From: Rob Studdert
On 14 January 2011 08:30, John Sessoms <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seems like all I have to do is express a desire for something and there's
> automatically a big scrum piling on to tell me how wrong I am to have that
> desire. It's not mandatory, so it's prohibited, and I'm not even allowed to
> want it?
Just get a Fuki when it arrives, they get it:
"About the time that the overall form and the positioning of dials
were decided, several pro photographers strongly urged the inclusion
of a 'lens aperture ring.' Without doubt, enabling the user to control
exposure ? the most important factor in photography, while looking
through the viewfinder, is an indispensable function."
http://www.finepix-x100.com/story/craftsmanship
I'm tempted.
The only thing holding me back (other than being broke as a convict
right now) is the hint in Miserere's blog that this is only the first
iteration and that the second iteration might be an interchangeable lens
version. That would be a killer!
But, there's also my brand loyalty to Pentax to consider.
I originally chose Pentax because I thought they gave me more value for
the money I spent, and despite my more than occasional gripes, I still
believe that's true.
Maybe not so true as in yesteryear but still true. I really want Pentax
to regain it's glorious position amongst the faithful.
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3379 - Release Date: 01/14/11
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
