On Mon, Apr 08, 2013, Paul Stenquist wrote: > On Apr 8, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Aahz Maruch <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013, Paul Stenquist wrote: >>> >>> With a screen that's 75% less reflective and 60% more processing >>> power. Sounds like a great machine for photographers. Now if my >>> current iMAc would just cooperate and die? >>> >>> http://www.apple.com/imac/features/ >> >> You might consider a Mac Mini instead. My primary got sick of throwing >> out a display every time zie upgraded, so that's what zie got last >> December. > > True enough. But I love my iMac 27, and I loved the iMac 24 that > preceded it. And since displays and computers have similar life > expectancy, the package is one that works well for me. What's more, > the new ones appear to be very special.
That does not match my experience (monitors and computers having similar lifespans). My HP LP2065 is almost six years old and still going strong. I've had some bad luck with desktops, this is my third or fourth in the same time period, but it would be unusual to have only one. (Anecdotal evidence, to be sure, but it matches what I've seen elsewhere.) -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ <*> <*> <*> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
