On Apr 8, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> On Apr 8, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Aahz Maruch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> With a screen that's 75% less reflective and 60% more processing
>>>> power. Sounds like a great machine for photographers. Now if my
>>>> current iMAc would just cooperate and die?
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.apple.com/imac/features/
>>> 
>>> You might consider a Mac Mini instead.  My primary got sick of throwing
>>> out a display every time zie upgraded, so that's what zie got last
>>> December.
>> 
>> True enough. But I love my iMac 27, and I loved the iMac 24 that
>> preceded it. And since displays and computers have similar life
>> expectancy, the package is one that works well for me. What's more,
>> the new ones appear to be very special.
> 
> That does not match my experience (monitors and computers having similar
> lifespans).  My HP LP2065 is almost six years old and still going strong.
> I've had some bad luck with desktops, this is my third or fourth in the
> same time period, but it would be unusual to have only one.
> 
> (Anecdotal evidence, to be sure, but it matches what I've seen
> elsewhere.)

My iMac is 6 years old. It is my fourth Mac all-in-one computer since my first 
Mac+, and I've never had one fail (with the exception of one replaced power 
supply which happened fairly early in one system's lifespan). Replacement has 
always been motivated by a perceived "need" for more memory, larger screen, 
faster processor, etc. I'll probably buy a new system this year, and the new 
iMac looks like a very attractive option. I can't see any advantage to the 
Mini, but I might go for a Mac Pro for the benefit of  greater capacity for 
internal HD capacity and external ports. (Anecdotal evidence, to be sure, but 
it matches what I've seen elsewhere.)

stan



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to