Paul via phone

> On Dec 9, 2013, at 11:50 PM, knarf <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I don't agonize but I am concerned. And my concern is that the blatant 
> sexualization of women in the media is degrading to them.
> 
> If you don't see it by now you never will.
> 
> Btw what you're doing is called the appeal to authority and it's a logical 
> fallacy. 
> 
> Who says that? Please cite authors and studies. If you're going to pull 
> "studies" out of your hat I'll call you on it.

Masters and Johnson, Kinsey and others.
> 
> Who says we're hard wired that way? And how do they know it? And just because 
> we're hard wired (which I don't buy) how does that make it right?
> 
> Finally, nature doesn't "dictate" anything. It just is. In any event this 
> isn't a natural problem, it's a human problem. It has to do with how we 
> humans treat each other. It's an ethical issue.
> 
> But, as with so many discussions that we have Paul, we've reached a 
> stalemate. I don't think either of us will change the mind of the other.
> 
> :-)
> 
> Cheers,
> frank
> 
> Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Paul via phone
>> 
>>> On Dec 9, 2013, at 10:35 PM, knarf <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I know I said I was done with this thread. Apparently I lied.  ;-)
>>> 
>>> But I had to jump in to completely disagree with your assertion wrt
>> the underlying premise.
>>> 
>>> To my mind the premise is that there is a huge disparity in the way
>> that women and men are portrayed in the media including the arts. Women
>> tend to be sexualized far more than men and often in denigrating and
>> offensive ways. That includes but doesn't have to mean nudity. 
>>> 
>>> People can point to exceptions but that doesn't change the fact that
>> women are sexualized far more often and in different ways than men.
>>> 
>>> This doesn't mean that sex is dirty or wrong or that it doesn't make
>> the world go 'round.
>>> 
>>> A bit of balance would be nice, that's all...
>> 
>> But those who study human sexuality contend that while men take
>> considerable pleasure in female nudity, most women are not deeply
>> aroused by the male body. Seems to be the way we're wired. Why agonize
>> over it? Nature doesn't dictate balance in all things.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> frank, back to spectating - for now
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Walt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I think the underlying premise -- that to portray a human as a
>> sexual 
>>>> being is to inherently denigrate other aspects of their humanity --
>> is
>>>> a 
>>>> false one.
>>>> 
>>>> All of this calls to mind a recent discovery for me: a woman named
>>>> Susan 
>>>> Oliver. I just happened to see her in an episode of the Andy
>> Griffith 
>>>> Show that was on the TV at the bar where I worked and was struck by
>>>> just 
>>>> how beautiful a woman she was, and as it turned out, a woman at the
>> bar
>>>> 
>>>> happened to know her name.
>>>> 
>>>> So, I started doing a little reading up on her on the internet, and
>> as 
>>>> it turned out, she was an absolutely fascinating person.
>>>> 
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Oliver
>>>> 
>>>> Now, to be sure, my initial impression of her was that she was just 
>>>> drop-dead gorgeous -- which is an observation I wouldn't likely make
>> of
>>>> 
>>>> a male, no matter how handsome he might be. My interest just isn't 
>>>> captured by attractive men. So, the very fact that I noticed Susan 
>>>> Oliver at all could be laid at the feet of sexual objectification,
>> or 
>>>> sexism, whatever you want to call it.
>>>> 
>>>> But, as I started to learn more about her and her accomplishments, I
>> 
>>>> developed a more wide-ranging kind of admiration for her. The fact
>> that
>>>> 
>>>> my initial interest in her was sparked by sexual attraction didn't
>> in 
>>>> any way detract from my appreciation of her as an accomplished woman
>>>> any 
>>>> more than learning more about her considerable achievements
>> minimized
>>>> my 
>>>> appreciation of her as a smokin' hot sex kitten.
>>>> 
>>>> It
> 
> “Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to