That photo doesn't even look like an eclipse, more like a normal half moon.   Not particularly artistic either.  Something any of us here could do with $3K worth of lens camera body and tripod.


On 2/9/2018 6:04 AM, Jostein wrote:
Link gone dead.
Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit of silliness in its own right.
https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065

Jostein

Den 07.02.2018 19:28, skrev Igor PDML-StR:

... or rather the photo title.

While looking at the moon photos of Peter Lik, I've found one
more photo that I suspect to be fake. Well, not the photo itself, but what
it claims to be.
http://www.lik.com/thework/clouds-skies-stars/lunareclipse.html

This one is titled "Lunar eclipse". My claim is that it is not an eclipse.
Rather, it is just one of the lunar phases.
An eclipse is a shadow of the Earth. So, the dark-light boundary has a
circular shape, not a straight one as here.
The straight line is consistent with the light source (sun) being
on the right, at about 90 degrees.


See lunar eclipse photos here:
https://www.space.com/25488-total-lunar-eclipse-photos-april-2014.html
(you'd need to "click-scroll" to the right to #4, 5, 7)
or here:
https://www.space.com/11963-unusual-long-total-lunar-eclipse-full-moon.html


I wonder what PDML astro-enthusiaststs think about that?

Igor





--
America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please.
    - P.J. O'Rourke


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to