That photo doesn't even look like an eclipse, more like a normal half moon.   Not particularly artistic either.  Something any of us here could do with $3K worth of lens camera body and tripod.

On 2/9/2018 6:04 AM, Jostein wrote:
Link gone dead.
Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit of silliness in its own right.


Den 07.02.2018 19:28, skrev Igor PDML-StR:

... or rather the photo title.

While looking at the moon photos of Peter Lik, I've found one
more photo that I suspect to be fake. Well, not the photo itself, but what
it claims to be.

This one is titled "Lunar eclipse". My claim is that it is not an eclipse.
Rather, it is just one of the lunar phases.
An eclipse is a shadow of the Earth. So, the dark-light boundary has a
circular shape, not a straight one as here.
The straight line is consistent with the light source (sun) being
on the right, at about 90 degrees.

See lunar eclipse photos here:
(you'd need to "click-scroll" to the right to #4, 5, 7)
or here:

I wonder what PDML astro-enthusiaststs think about that?


America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please.
    - P.J. O'Rourke

PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to