Apparently, they have reworked the website (, removing the two
full-moon photos that were being debunked by Fstoppers.
I suspect they regenerated web-galleries.
So, the new link is

BTW, the two photos with full-moons were in this collection just 2 days ago:

I am guessing if I were to publish my OP in this thread on a more visible website, where it would be picked up by many news outlets (petapixel, boingboing, etc.) - he'd be removing this eclipse photo too, or at least changing the title.
So, enjoy while it is still there!  [tongue in cheek]


 Jostein Fri, 09 Feb 2018 03:06:17 -0800 wrote:

Link gone dead.

Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit of silliness in its own right.


Den 07.02.2018 19:28, skrev Igor PDML-StR:

... or rather the photo title.

While looking at the moon photos of Peter Lik, I've found one
more photo that I suspect to be fake. Well, not the photo itself, but what
it claims to be.

This one is titled "Lunar eclipse". My claim is that it is not an eclipse.
Rather, it is just one of the lunar phases.
An eclipse is a shadow of the Earth. So, the dark-light boundary has a
circular shape, not a straight one as here.
The straight line is consistent with the light source (sun) being
on the right, at about 90 degrees.

See lunar eclipse photos here:
(you'd need to "click-scroll" to the right to #4, 5, 7)
or here:

I wonder what PDML astro-enthusiaststs think about that?


PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to