In the third paragraph they mention Rhine II which has something important with Lik's work, it's highly manipulated, and not at all representative of the scene as recorded, at least the Cindy Sherman work also mentioned was made using a method that makes endless mechanical reproduction somewhat more difficult due to the process being long out dated.


On 2/9/2018 9:15 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Mark Roberts <postmas...@robertstech.com> wrote:
Jostein wrote:

Link gone dead.
Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit
of silliness in its own right.
https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065
This article from the New York Times has the sad, predictable truth
about the resale value of Peter Lik photos:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/business/peter-liks-recipe-for-success-sell-prints-print-money.html
That's just such a great read.


--
America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please.
    - P.J. O'Rourke


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to