You've fallen for the marketing...

> On 21 Dec 2018, at 03:43, John <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> If the three photos were attributed to photographers Tom, Dick and Harry (or 
> Peter, John & Larry), being elbow to elbow in the same bus to photograph 
> polar bears would make sense.
> 
> But it's NOT Tom, Dick and Harry. It's three well known top professionals who 
> all make their incomes from the *uniqueness* of their images.
> 
>> On 12/20/2018 15:44:48, P. J. Alling wrote:
>> There are communities in parts of Canada around Hudson's Bay and Alaska 
>> where Polar Bears wander down the middle of what you could call Main Street, 
>> and there's no accounting for the stupidity of people.  Bears of all kinds 
>> are dangerous, hair triggered giant, on a human scale at least, carnivores, 
>> who won't hesitate to attack when they feel threatened, or maybe just 
>> hungry, and certain people just don't seem to understand that.
>> Case in point, (Grizzly first cousin to a Polar Bear), 
>> http://www.explorenorth.com/videos/grizzly-photographer_killed.html There's 
>> no date on this article but I believe it was remarked upon in the PDML back 
>> when it happened a number of years ago IIRC, or maybe it was another 
>> incident, not really important.
>> Now there is a distinct possibility that the three photographers took the 
>> image from a vehicle that looks like the  one pictured in this article,
>> https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/2017/02/17/polar-bear-spotting-churchill-canada/14872880344228
>>  but, don't discount that there are photographers taking photos of bears, 
>> while just wandering around the wilderness.  There may be rules as in Denali 
>> to keep at least a quarter mile away from bears, but as I said, people can 
>> be unbelievably stupid, and there isn't a Ranger behind every tree to 
>> enforce the rules.  Really would you want there to be?
>>> On 12/20/2018 1:35 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>>> I think it's more easily explained by a bunch of photographers on a tour 
>>> having to stand next to each other inside an anti-polar bear cage or 
>>> something, than it is by plagiarism. They're not going to be wandering 
>>> around at will, choosing the best spot, in a place full of hungry polar 
>>> bears.
>>> 
>>>> On 20 Dec 2018, at 17:03, John <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I note that Mangelsen Gallery doesn't identify a photographer, but 
>>>> presumably if another photographer had taken it, the gallery would 
>>>> attribute it to them, so it "must" have been taken by Thomas Mangelsen. ???
>>>> 
>>>> That raises more questions than it answers.
>>>> 
>>>> We now have three versions of the same image (one a mirror copy) 
>>>> supposedly taken by Thomas Mangelsen, Kennan Ward and/or Tom & Pat Leeson.
>>>> 
>>>> I just don't see the three** of them standing tripod to tripod to tripod 
>>>> photographing the same trio of bears. So who plagiarized whom?
>>>> 
>>>> I still wonder how the two versions of the image came to be mirrored and 
>>>> was it taken in Churchill in Manitoba or at ANWR in Alaska ... or 
>>>> somewhere else? But that's the least of the questions I have about the 
>>>> image.
>>>> 
>>>> Another thing ... if it was purchased from Mangelsen Gallery, there should 
>>>> be a label on the back, especially if it's a limited edition print 
>>>> (certificate of authenticity?). A limited edition print should also be 
>>>> signed & numbered, usually on the mat.
>>>> 
>>>> Finally, that's a mighty cheap looking frame for an image that sold for so 
>>>> much.
>>>> 
>>>>> On 12/19/2018 22:49:33, ann sanfedele wrote:
>>>>> John - Ken wrote me off list  - I didnt realise he had not sent his reply 
>>>>> to the list.. As  a result of his correct ID I replied...
>>>>> Third attribution today...  I think you  have the right answer --   The 
>>>>> price adds up to what friend 1 paid for it
>>>>> https://www.mangelsen.com/platinum-level-images/winter-solace-2446.html
>>>>> and who was it that noted that it could have been taken on a photo outing 
>>>>> in in Churchill -   I knew (or felt certain  that was where it was taken)
>>>>> thanks, Ken
>>>>> ann
>>>>> On 12/19/2018 8:04 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>>>> Ann, it's a Thomas Mangelsen image titled "Winter Solace", one of 1500 
>>>>> copies, with only 5 left for sale by Mangelsen - it goes for $1595. A 
>>>>> mother polar bear and cubs are a familiar subject for those that 
>>>>> photograph them.
>>>>> Hope this helps.
>>>>>> On 12/19/2018 10:31 PM, John wrote:
> 
> 
> -- 
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must never question.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to