Bob, The pictures are gorgeous. But that shows how good the photographer is. At this resolution it tells next to nothing about the lens (except that it focuses really close :) But then again, for $300 (as was the target price), I would be tempted...
Mishka > From: Rfsindg > Subject: Re: 100mm 2.8 Macro vs. 100mm 2.8 > Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 17:34:48 -0700 > > -------- > > << From: Mishka > << unless you are a collector, or have tons of spare cash > << and time, i see no reason whatsoever to lust for macro a*100/2.8 > > < William Robb replied: > < Obviously, you have never used one......<g> > > Bill, > > I looked at my PUG contributions... Lots with the A100/2.8 Macro. > http://pug.komkon.org/01sep/Stail.html > http://pug.komkon.org/01jul/bfly36.html > http://pug.komkon.org/01jan/pointsettia.html > http://pug.komkon.org/00sep/00sept/diamond.html > http://pug.komkon.org/00marc/tulipb.html > This is truly one of my favorite lenses. > > Regards, Bob S. Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
