On 8 Nov 2002 at 11:02, Steve Desjardins wrote: > Part of this is how important the image is vs. the price of the camera. > I think a pro will risk the camera for the shot, whereas the amateur > might be somewhat more protective of equipment since the image is not > actually worth money to them. For a pro, the image could potentially > pay for a broken camera.
That's certainly a good point however for me it's more trust in my equipment and a realization that pampered gear often results in lost opportunities, of course a good insurance policy helps :-) Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
