Andrew,
You are spot on!
I'm an RF engineer with additional support circuitry and simply don't
need FPGA design or other FPGA support stuff. If Protel / Altium want me to go
elsewhere I will, though P99SE does most all things I need. All I need is
a package that will produce good PCB's in a cost effective manner even
if I do have to produce workarounds for microstrip chokes etc.
Why the hell can't Altium just give us a general PCB package. Also, John
Ross I'm with you. I'm not a codey. I don't do macros etc. never
needed them. If I *really* have to learn a scripted language then I will,
but I didn't think I would ever have to just to do PCB's!
I will stay with P99SE until I am forced to adopt another package,
or be persuaded to go with an upgrade path (c'mon altium, convince me)

Cheers
Dave

Friday, November 19, 2004, 6:47:33 PM, you wrote:

> I would upgrade if they would simply offer us laggers a reasonable fixed
> upgrade price.  The more upgrades that occur, the more expensive it is, and
> less likely it is that I will upgrade.  The next version will likely be
> better, and add additional modules I don't need, and the increased price to
> upgrade will probably scare me away again.  I can't imagine I'm the only one
> in this situation.

> I don't need the FPGA support.  I just need a decent program for schematic
> capture and PCB design.  That's it.  Protel used to be the perfect program
> for that.  Protel is complete overkill for that now.  I don't see that
> Protel wants me as a customer, so I don't think it is unreasonable to ask
> members of this forum if there is anything out there that may fit my minimal
> needs a bit more economically.  Any recommendations?



 
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to