cool, that's what i thought, thanks Harry

but i thought you were a DXP'er ??

if you are, please tell me i am not wasting a HUGE amount of time building a very big pile of schematic symbols in 99SE, i.e. that they will be fully transportable to DXP if and when we ever do that

we have chosen the painful path of making a unique sch symbol with exact match up to EACH part in our newish MRP system
so this makes for a lot of seemingly duplicate symbols


(
i use the royal 'we' here so that if this was a poor choice at least 'I' didn't make it :)
)


i do recall brad's admontion about spaces in footprint names and will audit for that, is there anything else?

i use a lot of 'demorgan' and 'ieee' symbols which are in fact just alternate graphics for the given symbol

things pointing different ways or big and small versions, that sort of thing

i understand these 'demorgan's should come across as well, correct ?

Dennis Saputelli

_______________________________________________________________________
Integrated Controls, Inc.           Tel: 415-647-0480  EXT 107
2851 21st Street                    Fax: 415-647-3003
San Francisco, CA 94110             www.integratedcontrolsinc.com


Harry Selfridge wrote:
Hi Dennis,

I can confirm that he is wrong. None of the problems he cites exist on my WinXP Pro (SP2+all patches to date) installation of 99SE.

If he is really having all those problems, he may be running WinXP home edition or he has some installation problem peculiar to his system.

99SE is very stable under WinXP Pro - at least it has been for me.

Regards - Harry


At 01:21 PM 4/13/05, you wrote:

can others confirm what Soren said here re problems 99SE & WINXP-SP2 ?

i thought others have said it works fine

we use WIN2K

Dennis Saputelli



____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



Reply via email to