Agreed, Frederik. I think this is really important. John
From: Frederik Stjernfelt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: April 26, 2015 6:41 PM To: [email protected]; Peirce-L 1 Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8466] Re: Natural Propositions, ps - Peirce's three distinctions are subtypes of partial consideration - F Den 26/04/2015 kl. 18.37 skrev John Collier <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> : Gary, I would say it is an abstraction from the perceptual judgment, where abstraction is understood as Locke's partial consideration. At least that is the way I seem to experience things myself. Perhaps others are different. John
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
