Jerry R., List: JR: Your situation with Jon S, that is, whether to start with the object or the sign, is a critical problem of philosophy.
I do not understand this comment. Gary R. and I have recently been discussing whether abduction more properly begins with the Rule (3ns) or the Result; and a while back, we were discussing whether the surprising fact is more properly associated with 1ns or 2ns. I am not aware of any disagreement between us about semeiosis; we both see it as following the vector of determination--object (2ns), sign (1ns), interpretant (3ns). Regards, Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
