Jon, list: 
I'm not sure but I beginning to think that your confinement of terms to ONE 
meaning is creating problems.

Firstness is pure sensation - without awareness. It is a state-of-pure-sensual 
experience...Peirce himself uses the term of 'sensation' in his discussion of 
Firstness...See his outline 1.308 and on, where he talks about the sensation of 
color.

Secondness is the experience of a dyad; of A interacting with B - a 'mutual 
action between two things regardless of any sort of third or medium" 1.322.

To go further and define existence as Secondness is to ignore that Thirdness 
plays a vital role in this existentiality. I doubt if that insect could exist 
without the laws of matter that make up its form. Existence, however, does 
operate in what some of us call 'Perfect' time [linear, Newtonian time] as 
differentiated from the 'Present' time of Firstness - and differentiated from 
the continuity of time that is Thirdness.

Edwina
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jon Alan Schmidt 
  To: Edwina Taborsky 
  Cc: Bev Corwin ; Jeffrey Brian Downard ; Peirce-L 
  Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 3:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Dynamic/Immediate Object and Determination/Causation


  Edwina, List:


  I am having some trouble with your use of terminology again.


    ET:  I have to have the mode of Firstness, or sensation, where I can feel . 
 What do I feel?


  Feeling is Firstness or Quality, but sensation is not--sensation is 
Secondness or Reaction.


    ET:  Third, I have to exist, in my own personal existentiality, within the 
laws of Thirdness, which provides me with the infrastructural form of my insect 
form or paramecium form.


  I think I see what you mean here, but just to be clear--existence is 
Secondness, not Thirdness.


  Regards,


  Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
  Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman
  www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt


  On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Edwina Taborsky <[email protected]> wrote:

    Bev, list: Identity and personal identity do not require consciousness; 
i.e., I, as an insect or paramecium, [a Dynamic Object when in an interaction 
with other 'things')...I do not have to have a consciousness of my self as this 
Dynamic Object. But, I do have to operate within the three categorical modes.

    I have to have the mode of Firstness, or sensation, where I can feel .  
What do I feel?

    I have to have the mode of Secondness, accompanying this Firstness, which 
enables me to have a brute sensation of my finiteness and thus feel external 
stimuli within my horizons [these external stimuli which I feel are the 
Immediate Objects of that external stimulip...and also, feel the extent of my 
own materiality.

    Third, I have to exist, in my own personal existentiality, within the laws 
of Thirdness, which provides me with the infrastructural form of my insect form 
or paramecium form.

    But- even though I  have no consciousness of this I do have a personal 
identity such that I exist as 'this' rather than 'that' [insect or 
paramecium]..and can react to external stimuli [Dynamic Objects]...which 
sensations become Immediate Objects within my senses.

    Edwina
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Bev Corwin 
      To: Jon Alan Schmidt 
      Cc: Jeffrey Brian Downard ; Peirce-L 
      Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 12:06 PM
      Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Dynamic/Immediate Object and 
Determination/Causation


      Hello everyone, I follow the discussions somewhat, however, not 
consistently. Many interesting thoughts and wondering how they would apply in 
situational case scenarios. So I have a question: How would you apply some of 
these Peirce "Dynamic/Immediate Object and Determination/Causation" ideas to a 
concept like "identity"? In particular, personal identity? Thanks in advance. 
Best wishes, Bev
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to