> On Aug 25, 2016, at 4:27 PM, Edwina Taborsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not referring to the action of communication but to the triadic semiosic > process of developing meaning. > > Let's say that I hear a frog. That frog or rather, the sound of the frog, is > the Dynamic Object. [The frog's croak it itself the Dynamic Interpretant of > the frog].
Ah. Yes in terms of that analysis I agree with you. My mistake. I thought you were talking a different sort of analysis.
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
