On 8/11/2017 5:09 PM, Helmut Raulien wrote:
A system, I think, is defined by the part of its structure, that does
not change. The system exists as long as this part of structure (set of
relations) exists. Which part of the structure is used to define the
system, can be arbitrary choice, but usually is something essential,
whatever this means.
You could apply Peirce's classification of signs to this analysis.
As an example, consider the book _War and Peace_. Peirce would call
the physical book a sign token. The corresponding type would be
the entire text, considered as a string of chapters, paragraphs,
sentences, words -- independent of any method of presentation
That type is an abstraction from the physical book. But there is
an even more general abstraction: the detailed plot of the book,
which is the same type for Tolstoy's original Russian and the
translation to English or any other language.
A very similar, but somewhat simplified plot type could be used
to classify a movie made from the book. The plot type for the
movie and the plot type for the book would both be special cases
of a more general plot type.
Every system has a "Now". This is the signs, that happen every now,
and this "now" travels through time.
You could apply that description to the movie as it is projected
on a screen (in a theater or on a computer).
But you could also apply it to the process of a person sitting
in a chair and reading the book -- in any language. That process
may be discontinuous, since people don't read _War and Peace_
in a single sitting.
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at