Gary F., Helmut, List:

GF:  ... do you know of any text where Peirce actually said that “form” was
first and “matter” second?


I offered several representative quotes in a previous post to demonstrate
that Peirce consistently associated Form with 1ns and Matter with 2ns,
rather than the other way around.  The following is the most relevant to
your question as posed here, this time without any omissions.

CSP:  Aristotle's metaphysics undoubtedly belongs to the general type of
evolutionary systems, as does for example, that of Hegel.  As I understand
it, he identifies the mode of the evolution of being with that of the
evolution of theory, notwithstanding his incessant oppositions of πρότερον
ούσίᾳ and πρότερον λόγῳ.  Matter is, for him, that which is what it is in
itself.  Form is that which is only so far as it is embodied in matter, and
is essentially dichotomic, as Plato made it.  The scholastic metaphysics,
on the other hand, looks upon the pure nature, or Form, as that which is
what it is in itself, and as prior to any embodiment of it.  It is looking
upon being as created, and regards its evolution as having the mode of
movement of practice.  Scotus appears to look upon individuation as an
unintelligible act of force.  From this point of view, matter (it is always
the Aristotelian matter I speak of, or that which simply exists) ought to
be held to exist only by reaction, and so to be that which is what it is by
force of *another*.  It is not necessary for the logician to embrace either
of these theories (of which I prefer the second.)  He had better remain
aloof. (R 517:92-93[18-19]; 1904)


In the evolution of being, what comes first is "that which is what it is in
itself," and what comes second is either "that which is only so far as it
is embodied" or "that which is what it is by force of another."  Hence for
Aristotle, Matter is first and Form is second; but for the scholastics and
Peirce, Form is first and Matter is second.  It is Matter, not Form, that
corresponds to force.

Regards,

Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to