Greetings Economists,
And I reject your notion of stasis. That capitalism changes but doesn't. The Russians were not nothing in history. Nor can you oppose the political will to change by saying Wallerstein says nothing. I demand power as a worker. What do you say intellectual?
Thanks,
Doyle Saylor
On Nov 2, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Carl Dassbach wrote:

If this is the case, if it is always changing then each mode of regulation is unique and historically specific and the resolution to the crisis of a mode of regulation has to be unique and can not correspond to "the kinds of transitions that have previously characterized capitalism." Hence, I reject Wallerstein's argument and the implicit structural functionalism of his thinking.

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to