Joseph G writes: " Carrol's argument is to sit on one's hands as our world
goes to pieces. It's the same as if someone would say that the economic
struggle is useless because exploitation can't be ended within the framework
of global capitalism. His reasoning is that fighting the capitalists on any
particular issue somehow means seeing the problem as "the opinions or
desires of individual capitalists or individual capitalist politicians."
Carrol's plan means capitulating to the capitalists on the environment,
which would not only make the looming environmental catastrophe so much more
likely and so much deeper, but would help give rise to capitulation on every
front."

Not at all, as anyone who has read my posts over the years knows. (I mostly
agree with the opening paragraphs of your post.) But the very possibility of
struggle disappears in the fog of cheerful announcements of what 'should be
done."

Carrol





_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to