Dave, there’s been some useful and grown-up discussion going on around
here.  I don’t think you’re trying to derail it, but you risk having that
effect. I think it would be better to ease off and see where it leads us,
because I’ve read some smart and enlightening things.


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>  "privacy properties of IETF protocols and concrete ways in which
>>> those could be improved."
>>>
>>
>> to repeat my statement from berlin, privacy by default.  and as many
>> places as we can enable it.
>>
>
>
> If we -- the IETF community -- had a definition of privacy, that would
> help, but we don't.
>
> If we knew what it meant to 'enable privacy' (nevermind whether by
> default), that would also help, but we don't.
>
> So the idea of 'privacy by default' well could serve as a useful
> catch-phrase, but at the moment, it lacks technical substance.  We have no
> shared, technical understanding of its meaning.
>
> No doubt you have particulars in mind.  No doubt lots of folks have their
> own set of particulars.  Unfortunately each person's particulars tends to
> be different.
>
> So what we lack are a) anything like a specific technical meaning for
> privacy, b) any system-level sense of what it means to provide privacy, or
> c) any prioritization of privacy issues so that we can get the most benefit
> from initial efforts.
>
> My question was meant to prompt discussion at a technical level.  There
> have been the tiniest wisps of comment on the list that might provide
> touchstones for this, but they haven't been pursued.  We need to pursue
> them.
>
> Catch-phrases will be useful to summarize the results.
>
> d/
>
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> perpass mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/perpass<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>
>
_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass

Reply via email to