On 17 September 2013 17:00, Eggert, Lars <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sep 10, 2013, at 20:46, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> > wrote: >> One approach to focus the discussion is to limit it to what the IETF can do. > > and, for those important topics that we aren't quite sure what the IETF > impact is going to be or even if there is any, I want to mention that it is > always possible to spin up a related research group in the IRTF. "Research" > in the widest possible sense of "not (yet) engineering" - not necessarily > academic science. > > It'd need a few folks determined to run the show and grow/form the community. > There certainly seems to be energy in this space at the moment. > > The nice thing about the IRTF is that have way fewer processes than the IETF; > for example, IRTF groups need not operate by consensus and can even be closed > membership.
Hmmm... "The CFRG is chaired by David McGrew([email protected]) and Kevin Igoe ([email protected])." _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
