On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> So... can we get back to coming up with a reasonable
>> definition,
> (1) no access to system calls (including file and network I/O)
> (2) no access to process memory, other than variables defined within the
> PL.
> What else?

Doesn't subvert the general PostgreSQL security mechanisms?  Not sure
how to formulate that.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to