On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> So... can we get back to coming up with a reasonable >> definition, > > (1) no access to system calls (including file and network I/O) > > (2) no access to process memory, other than variables defined within the > PL. > > What else?
Doesn't subvert the general PostgreSQL security mechanisms? Not sure how to formulate that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
