Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> (1) no access to system calls (including file and network I/O)
>> (2) no access to process memory, other than variables defined within the
>> PL.
>> What else?
> Doesn't subvert the general PostgreSQL security mechanisms? Not sure
> how to formulate that.
As long as you can't do database access except via SPI, that should be
covered. So I guess the next item on the list is no, or at least
restricted, access to functions outside the PL's own language.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
