* Simon Riggs (si...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > +1 to the idea of an example database, used throughout the docs > Sounds like a summer of code project.
Agreed. I'll add it to the GSoC ideas page. > Since we don't have that now, it won't work for 9.4. None of this is on the table for 9.4 as far as I'm concerned.. > I still like the idea of a database installed by default on initdb, by > default. Packagers can of course do what they like. I fail to see the point of adding something that's targetted at novice / end-users which 90% (yes, it's a random # that I pulled, but it's surely the majority, at least) of installs won't have. For my 2c, it'd also be a disservice to our users and to ourselves to encourage a design that minimizes the database's understanding of the data and greatly reduces the set of PG's capabilities that can be used. Thanks, Stephen
Description: Digital signature