On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > A real pain is the documentation, because it means writing a documentation > with only integer functions, then overwriting it with doubles. This is dumb > work, really, for the sake of "a cleaner git history", the beauty of it no > one will ever contemplate...
You know, you make comments like this pretty much every time anybody suggests that you should change anything in any patch you write. It doesn't matter whether the change is suggested by Heikki, or by Michael, or by Andres, or by me. You pretty much always come back and say something that amounts to "changing the patch I already wrote is a waste of time". That gets a little disheartening after a while. This community's procedure is that patches have to be reviewed and reach consensus in order to get committed, and in my opinion that is generally not "dumb" but rather something that enhances the end result. I value your contributions to the community and I hope you will continue making them, but I don't like it when people call my ideas dumb. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
