Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Well, me to. But my feeling is the patch received entirely insufficient
>> amount of thorough code review, considering how important part of the code
>> it touches. I agree docs are an important part of a patch, but polishing
>> user-level docs would hardly move the patch closer to being committable
>> (especially when there's ~50kB of READMEs).
> I have to admit that I was really hoping Tom would follow through on
> his statement that he would look into this one, or that Dean Rasheed
> would get involved.
I'm sorry I didn't get to it, but it's not like I have been slacking
during this commitfest. At some point, you just have to accept that
not everything we could wish will get into 9.6.
I will make it a high priority for 9.7, though.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
