On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Tomas Vondra
>> <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Well, me to. But my feeling is the patch received entirely insufficient
>>> amount of thorough code review, considering how important part of the code
>>> it touches. I agree docs are an important part of a patch, but polishing
>>> user-level docs would hardly move the patch closer to being committable
>>> (especially when there's ~50kB of READMEs).
>> I have to admit that I was really hoping Tom would follow through on
>> his statement that he would look into this one, or that Dean Rasheed
>> would get involved.
> I'm sorry I didn't get to it, but it's not like I have been slacking
> during this commitfest.  At some point, you just have to accept that
> not everything we could wish will get into 9.6.

I did not mean to imply otherwise.  I'm just explaining why I didn't
spend time on it - I figured I was not the most qualified person, and
of course I have not been slacking either.  :-)

> I will make it a high priority for 9.7, though.


Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to