Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Well, there are at least two patchsets we're actively discussing >> reverting, so I think this should wait till those decisions are resolved.
> OK, but that may well mean we don't get this done before beta1, which > I think is a bummer, but oh well. pgindent is reliable enough that I'm not really worried about running it post-beta. Obviously sooner is better than later, to give authors of 9.7 patches more time to rebase; but I do not think we should give ourselves extra work just to do it a little sooner. > There are a lot more than 2 patchsets that are busted at the moment, > unfortunately, but I assume you are referring to "snapshot too old" > and "Use Foreign Key relationships to infer multi-column join > selectivity". Yeah, those are the ones I'm thinking of. I've not heard serious proposals to revert any others, have you? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers