On 2/1/17 12:03 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
I'm unsure whether it is a good idea, I like terse interfaces, but this is just an opinion.
I think the issue here is that the original case for this is a user accidentally getting into an \if and then having no clue what's going on. That's similar to what happens when you miss a quote or a semicolon. We handle those cases with %R, and I think %R needs to support if as well.
Perhaps there's value to providing more info (active branch, etc), but ISTM trying to do that will just confuse the original (%R) case.
-- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
