On Wednesday 12 July 2006 04:15, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Absolutely PL/J should be considered in the same light as PL/Java.
>
> Consider this a request for PL/J to be included in the core.
Frankly I don't care which one is used, as long as the one (and ONLY one) that
is included is the most mature and stable.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Dave
>
> On 11-Jul-06, at 12:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > David,
> >
> >> It's good to integrate things with the core as needed. What plans do
> >> we have to integrate PL/J?
> >
> > None, if the PL/J team doesn't speak up. So far I have yet to see
> > a request for PL/J or even a release notice.
> >
> > --Josh
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
