On 12-Jul-06, at 10:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

"Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 7/12/06, David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are they mutually exclusive? I can imagine, at least for development
purposes, that someone might want to install both.

I believe both can be installed and running at the same time. I don't
really think anyone would want to run both, but that's just my

On what grounds do you not think that?  PL/J uses an external JVM,
PL/Java one that is running in the backend process.  (Or maybe it was
the other way 'round, I'm too tired to remember tonight.)  That's a
really fundamental difference that makes them suited for very different applications; not to mention the resulting different licensing scenarios.
No, this is correct.

The points that have been made in this thread about PL/J not being
actively maintained are important, but other than that objection,

I expect to see a new release shortly.
I can see no reason that PL/J wouldn't have an equal claim to inclusion in core. Perhaps more, because it gives us an extra layer of insulation
from JVM licensing questions.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to