On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 07:29:52AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Wednesday 12 July 2006 04:15, Dave Cramer wrote: > > Absolutely PL/J should be considered in the same light as PL/Java. > > > > Consider this a request for PL/J to be included in the core. > > Frankly I don't care which one is used, as long as the one (and ONLY one) > that > is included is the most mature and stable.
Are they mutually exclusive? I can imagine, at least for development purposes, that someone might want to install both. Cheers, D > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > > > > Dave > > > > On 11-Jul-06, at 12:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > David, > > > > > >> It's good to integrate things with the core as needed. What plans do > > >> we have to integrate PL/J? > > > > > > None, if the PL/J team doesn't speak up. So far I have yet to see > > > a request for PL/J or even a release notice. > > > > > > --Josh > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > > > broadcast)--------------------------- > > > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > > -- > === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === > Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 > Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 > http://www.commandprompt.com/ > -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
