Tom Lane wrote:
...  equal claim to inclusion
in core.  Perhaps more, because it gives us an extra layer of insulation
from JVM licensing questions.

Why to you persist talking about licensing issues with PL/Java? There are none. PL/Java builds and runs just fine with gcj and the above statement is completely false.

What JVM requirements does PL/J currently have? What license implications are imposed by the components that it depends upon?

Thomas Hallgren

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to