Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > >> I think we should drop the term usability as a selling part of the PR > >> and push it into further description.. Instead we should use a slightly > >> more expensive word (think 50 cents, not 5). :) > > > > Fine, I am all ears. Also, a lot of people are thinking usability > > improvements aren't a big item, but they are. I had a press person ask > > during the 8.0 release, "You have a lot of large features in 8.0, but > > what is there for the ordinary database user?". At that time all we had > > was COPY CSV. This release will have a lot of those usability > > improvements. > > I don't disagree with your thought process and I full agree :). I am > just saying we should spice it up a bit :) > > Hmmmm.... > > PostgreSQL has showed an unprecedented commitment to all skill levels of > database developers. With the release of 8.2 the group has focused on > refinement and usability. Features such as ... add to the already > impressive list of enterprise class features such as ...
Sounds very good, and that was my goal, that we get a "focus" idea for the release, I think that is it. As I remember, 8.0 was enterprise features, and 8.1 was performance. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
