Josh Berkus wrote: > Bruce, > > Realistically I just don't see getting everything in the ToDo patch list in; > my vote is that we start deferring stuff for 8.4 if it doesn't have a > reviewer, except for items which were submitted early in the cycle (and to > whom it would be unfair).
Advertising
It seems unfair to disinguish between early/last in cycle postings. > If that means shortening the 8.4 cycle somewhat, I'm for that ... feature > freeze in Feburary would be even better than April, because it means we could > be in Beta for the May-June-July conferences, and increase our probability of > being able to release at a major conference or PostgreSQL conference. > > Obviously for 8.4 reviewers need to start reviewing stuff from the first week > of the development cycle. I also don't actually see anything wrong with a > 3-month feature freeze if we can somehow branch development earlier. Easy > for me to say, I know. Yea, this is just pushing off work until later, which I don't support. There is no easy out here and I am afraid we will just have to accept a 3-month feature freeze. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
