On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:34:56PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >How much visibility do we have into the mhonarc database? We should be
> >able to come up with a simple redirector that would point the old
> >mhonarc URLs to URLs for the new system...
And here I thought the reason we used tho POS was because it was the
only archiver that used PostgreSQL as it's backend...
> It's a file system. It simply generates HTML (or in our case) PHP files
> from each message in an mbox. That's one of the reasons for the monthly
> break - without it, the directories would be unusably full of files.
> I the current URLs represent the month, and the ID of the message as it
> comes out of the mbox I believe. We could probably write a script to
> dump a list of message IDs, directories and mbox positions I imagine,
> and then import that into a new database.
Yeah, if the files still resemble real emails then we can probably come
up with a way to pull the data in.
> It's been on my list to rewrite the whole archive system for a while for
> various reasons. There is quite a bit of crossover with the patch
> tracker I proposed so I was hoping to look at both together.
Let me know when you start on that...
Jim Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?