On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:50:26PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >Speaking of reviewers... should we put some thought into how we can
> >increase the number of people who can review code? It seems that's one
> >of our biggest bottlenecks...
> Having recently dragged myself from never seeing the code before to being 
> able to provide an early review to help the committers out, I can tell you 
> a few things that would have sped up that process and therefore improve 
> the odds more people will navigate the trail.
> My main difficulty was figuring out a workable way to build a local mirror 
> of the code (so I could get off-line diffs), keep it in sync with the 
> development tree, while branching out working areas to evaluate patches or 
> do new development in.  A good example walkthrough of how to do that using 
> standard tools would be a big help.  Hint:  if you suggest CVsup I'll 
> smack you.
> Overall, though, I don't think there would have been any substitute for 
> what I learned by putting together my own small patches, so in some 
> respects thinking about how to lower the bar for doing that would also 
> ultimately expand the review pool.  The main issues I had as a newcomer to 
> the codebase was getting data in/out of the new code I added that was 
> buried inside the system.  Here are some examples of what I kept 
> hoping to find documentation on:
> -Examples and usage guidelines for eLog and eReport (the stuff in the FAQ 
> needs some more meat)
> -How to add a GUC variable.  Once I've got that, now I can adjust the code 
> in real-time just by updating it.
> -How to add to the statistics for some part of the system that track a new 
> variable and follow how that moves through the collector process.
> If you put people into a position where they easily can poke data in at 
> one end, see how it rattles around inside the engine by logging, and get 
> some statistics on the result, now you've got someone who can build their 
> own simple patches without being so frustrated.

Would you be interested in providing this meat?  You're uniquely
qualified because your shins still smart from all the things you
barked them on :)

David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666
                              Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to