>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2007 at 7:03 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think ... there's still room for a simple tool that can zero out > the meaningless data in a partially-used WAL segment before compression. > It seems reasonable to me, so long as you keep archive_timeout at > something reasonably high. > > If nothing else, people that already have a collection of archived WAL > segments would then be able to compact them. That would be a *very* useful tool for us, particularly if it could work against our existing collection of old WAL files. -Kevin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
