"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Can't run Postgres securely" would be a more-than-sufficient >> reason not to support NT4, IMHO.
> It could still be run on NT4 under the following conditions: > 1) Running as a service > 2) Running if the user logged in is not an administrator. Well, isn't "running as a service" sufficient? I thought that was the only interesting case for non-hackers anyway. As long as you get an error message that's reasonably clear about what you can do instead, this hardly seems like a showstopper... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]