Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A 50-parameter query could be .. interesting ..

> I realize that you need this level of output to reflect what is 
> happening at the protocol level, but seeing all the protocol detail is 
> not really what you expect when you turn on basic statement logging, is it?

Well, we've certainly been beat up often enough about the lack of
logging bind parameter values --- I don't think there's any question
about the importance of printing them.  I agree that the proposed format
is much too verbose though.  In particular, a separate LOG message per
parameter is NOT what I had in mind; I want them in DETAIL lines of the
bind log message.  (This'd perhaps also address Oliver's issue, since
if you didn't want to see the values you could turn down

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to