Sorry, forgot to show sample output:
LOG: prepare sel1: SELECT $1 + $2;
LOG: bind sel1: SELECT $1 + $2;
DETAIL: $1 = "8", $2 = "5"
LOG: execute sel1: SELECT $1 + $2;
LOG: prepare sel1: SELECT 3;
LOG: bind sel1: SELECT 3;
LOG: execute sel1: SELECT 3;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > A 50-parameter query could be .. interesting ..
> > >
> > > > I realize that you need this level of output to reflect what is
> > > > happening at the protocol level, but seeing all the protocol detail is
> > > > not really what you expect when you turn on basic statement logging, is
> > > > it?
> > >
> > > Well, we've certainly been beat up often enough about the lack of
> > > logging bind parameter values --- I don't think there's any question
> > > about the importance of printing them. I agree that the proposed format
> > > is much too verbose though. In particular, a separate LOG message per
> > > parameter is NOT what I had in mind; I want them in DETAIL lines of the
> > > bind log message. (This'd perhaps also address Oliver's issue, since
> > > if you didn't want to see the values you could turn down
> > > log_error_verbosity.)
> >
> > OK, I will continue in that direction. Will post a new patch.
>
> Updated patch attached. It prints the text bind parameters on a single
> detail line. I still have not seen portal names generated by libpq.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
