Mohan, Ross wrote: > The only part I am pretty sure about is that real-world experience shows SCSI > is better for a mixed I/O environment. Not sure why, exactly, but the > command queueing obviously helps, and I am not sure what else does. > > || TCQ is the secret sauce, no doubt. I think NCQ (the SATA version of per > se drive request reordering) > should go a looong way (but not all the way) toward making SATA > 'enterprise acceptable'. Multiple > initiators (e.g. more than one host being able to talk to a drive) is a > biggie, too. AFAIK only SCSI > drives/controllers do that for now.
What is 'multiple initiators' used for in the real world? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings