On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 09:09:21PM +0200, Damien Cassou wrote: > On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 8:54 PM, kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Whats the verdict with the Squeksource section ? Do I covert it to a > > SmalltalkHub section or do I continue to chapter 4 ? > > > I think you can keep the section about squeaksource and replace it > with ss3 and smalltalkhub instead. >
That sounds right. Squeaksource.com remains operational, but readers should be guided to use smalltalkhub and ss3 for new work. Dave
