Would it be possible to have 'raw' instead of state?

Stef

I'll make a new version to integrate.


Cheers,
Andrei

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Done!

    Doru

    On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


        On 03 Oct 2014, at 15:23, Tudor Girba <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        > Great. I checked it quickly and it looks great. I added you
        to the Moose team. Could you please commit directly in the repo?

        Done, you'll have to merge my version since it is two commits
        behind.

        > Doru
        >
        > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
        > I made my first additions/changes to GT-Inspector:
        >
        > ===
        > Name: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.54
        > Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe
        > Time: 3 October 2014, 3:03:17.252107 pm
        > UUID: 853cfe8d-314c-4eac-ad67-8c6eff2b4f83
        > Ancestors: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-TudorGirba.53
        >
        > Customized GT-Inspector for Integer, Float and Character
        > ===
        >
        > MCZ attached:
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > I made it so that 'State' shows slots only (if any) and
        takes precedence.
        >
        > I added an 'Integer' tab to Integer with decimal, hex,
        octal, binary and optional character aspects.
        >
        > I added a 'Float' tab to Float with (binary, base 2)
        significant and exponent (self = significant * (2 **
        exponent)) [the old sign field was not needed since
        significant is signed already), while making the 'State' show
        the 2 indexed slots (which is more correct IMHO).
        >
        > I added a 'Character' tab with self, codepoint and unicode
        aspects.
        >
        > Obviously this has to be iterated upon. I am already very
        happy that I could figure out how to do this. Much more from
        the old Eye inspectors will follow.
        >
        > Sven
        >
        > PS1: Implementing this, I sense that we might need an option
        so that a field can show some label for its value, while
        clicking further on it would continue on something else
        (obviously related), differently field by field.
        >
        > PS2: Is is necessary/useful for the States fields in
        #gtInspectorVariableValuePairs to be a Set instead of
        something that preserves the order ?
        >
        >
        >
        > --
        > www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
        >
        > "Every thing has its own flow"





-- www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>

    "Every thing has its own flow"



Reply via email to